The Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of a prior decision in CWJC No.4435 of 2015, following an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding the examination of the respondent's case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4470 of 2015
=========================================================== 1. The Union of India through its General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 2. The General Manager, Personnel, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, Danapur Division, Danapur. 4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Danapur Division, Danapur. 5. The Railway Board, through its Chairman, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 6. The Secretary, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 7. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, Danapur. 8. The Senior Divisional Operating Manager, Danapur. .... .... Respondents- Petitioners Versus Prabhat Kumar Sinha, son of Sri Siya Ram Lakhan Prasad, resident of villageRailway Quarter No.355/A Loco Colony, P.O. & P.S..-Khagaul, District-Patna. .... .... Applicant-Respondent
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. D. K. Sinha, Senior Advocate Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)
Date: 07-04-2016
The challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna on 25th of March, 2014 whereby an Original Application filed by the respondent was disposed of with direction to the petitioners to examine the case of the applicant treating the Original Application as his representation and in case it is found to be similar to that in Original Application decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, then similar benefits be considered to the applicant.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4470 of 2015 dt.07-04-2016
2/2
Similar order passed by the Tribunal was subject matter of challenge on behalf of the writ petitioners in CWJC No.4435 of 2015. The writ petition has been disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to decide the matter within four months.
In the light of the aforesaid order, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in CWJC No.4435 of 2015 decided on 31st of March, 2016.
(Hemant Gupta, J.)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Sunil/-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CWJC No.4435 of 2015Applied¶12
Union of India through its General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur and others
Prabhat Kumar Sinha
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
