High Court dismissed two writ applications filed by petitioners challenging the State orders for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner counsel on the day of hearing.
Writ applications dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3664 of 2014
Versus
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3286 of 2014
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : (In CWJC No.3664 of 2014)
Patna High Court CWJC No.3664 of 2014 (3) dt.06-01-2016
2 / 2
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bhadur Singh (In CWJC No.3286 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
3 06-01-2016
None for the petitioners even today on call. Same was the position yesterday when it was passed over. Counsel for the respondents however, is present.
Writ applications are dismissed for non-prosecutions.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
Sanjay/-
U
Surendra Prasad
Ram Laddu Yadav
Suresh Prasad
Shyam Sundar Prasad
Rajendra Prasad
The State of Bihar
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
