Dismissed

Pankaj Kumar Basak v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Jul 2016CWJC/25634/2013

Case brief

AI extract

Writ application dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls.

AI extract

Pankaj Kumar Basak Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2016)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25634 of 2013

	====================================================== 1. Pankaj Kumar Basak S/O Sri Damodar Prasad Basak Resident Of Village- Beni Bahadurganj, P.O And P.S- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Government Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj, Bihar. 4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj. 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj. 6. The Block Development Officer, Bahadurganj, P.S- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.
	.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay
	====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
2	22-07-2016 Despite repeated calls, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the application.
	The counsel for the respondents-State submits that the writ application has become infructuous as per new Resolution of the Government even “Tanti” is a scheduled castes. Be that as it may, since no one has appeared to press the application, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/-