Disposed

Md.Motiur Rahman Aziz and Ors. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Jun 2016CWJC/22818/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners approached the court regarding undefined cadre status and lack of promotional avenues while in service. The State subsequently notified the cadre rules dated 12.04.2016. The court found the primary grievance redressed and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of as the primary grievance regarding cadre rules and promotional avenues has been redressed by the State notifications.

Md.Motiur Rahman Aziz and Ors. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22818 of 2011

¶3

====================================================== 1. Md. Motiur Rahman Aziz S/O Late Md. Hasan R/O MohallaBrahamputra, Mehandi Hasan Chowk, P.S.- Brahampura, P.O.- M.I.T. Brahampura, Distt.- Muzaffarpur 2. Moinuddin Ahmad S/O Late Wasiuddin Ahmad R/O Vill.- Mansi Chapra, P.S.- Chakiya, P.O.- Bhuwan Chapra, Distt.- East Champaran 3. Iqbal Hayat S/O Late Md. Gulab R/O Mohalla- Pirbahore, Lal Bagh, P.S.- Pirbahore, Distt.- Patna. .... .... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary Cabinet Secretariat (Rajbhasha) Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary General Administration Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Principal Secretary Finance Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Director, Raj Bhasha (Urdu) Directorate, Bihar, Patna.

¶4

.... .... Respondents.

¶5

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Pratap, G P-6

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 16 22-06-2016 A second supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State annexing therewith notification nos.279 and 280, both dated 12.04.2016, by which the cadre rules including promotional avenues have been duly notified by the State. That was the grievance of the petitioner. He had been working for over 15 years in an undefined cadre, which has no promotional avenues.

¶7

Thus, the primary grievance of the petitioners has been redressed, though it has taken over five years and, during the period, the petitioners have retired without getting the benefits of

¶8

Patna High Court CWJC No.22818 of 2011 (16) dt.22-06-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

cadre rules and the promotional avenues provided therein for the

¶11

first time.

¶12

Be that as it may, the cadre rule has now been framed, as

¶13

noted above, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶14

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Trivedi/-

¶15

Md.Motiur Rahman Aziz and Ors. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Motiur Rahman Aziz and Ors. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Barik Vs The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Narayan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janardan Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pawan Kumar Vs the Union of India and Ors.