The High Court of Patna dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution. The petitioners did not appear on call to press the petition or seek an adjournment, and no reply to the counter-affidavit was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21017 of 2011
======================================================
Ram Briksh Ravidas & Anr
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Respondent/s : AC to GP 15
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
6. 27-06-2016 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioners either
to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned
A.C. to Govt. Pleader – 15 as well as learned counsel for the
respondent/Bihar Public Service Commission are present. Earlier,
the case was adjourned, as per instance of the petitioners for filing
reply to the counter affidavit. On perusal of the record, it appears
that no reply has been filed.
The writ petition stands dismissed due to non-
prosecution.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U
Ram Briksh Ravidas
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
