The High Court at Patna orally dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner chose not to press it during the hearing, with no appearance from the respondents.
Application dismissed as infructuous due to non-pressing by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19944 of 2013
====================================================== Sudhir Prasad Son Of Late Kameshwar Prasad Resident Of Village And P.O. Maldah, P.S. Barbigha, District Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Bihar School Examination Board Through Its Secretary, Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board Bihar Patna 3. Braj Kishore Prasad @ Rajesh Kumar Son Of Ramdeo Prasad Resident Of Village Fedali Singh Byha, P.O. Maldah P.S. Barbigha, District Sheikhpura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 23-06-2016 Mr. Pankaj Kumar, the counsel for the petitioner is present. No one appears on behalf of the respondents. Mr. Kumar submits that he does not wish to press this writ application as the same has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
HR/-
U
Sudhir Prasad Son Of Late Kameshwar Prasad
The Bihar School Examination Board
Braj Kishore Prasad
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
