Disposed
Yogendra Rai Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Patna HCCWJC/19727/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
| Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19727 of 2015 =========================================================== |
|---|
| Yogendra Rai Sharma, Son of Late Jayanath Sharma, Resident of Mohalla- New Colony Dak Bangala, Road Bettiah, P.S.-Bettiah, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner Versus |
| 1. The State of Bihar |
| 2. The Director (Primary Education), Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna. |
| 3. The District Education Officer, West Champaran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== |
| Appearance : |
| For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pratap Sharma, Advocate |
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, A.C. to G.P.-31 =========================================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-01-2016 |
| Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to |
| withdraw this application with a liberty to approach this Court in |
| future, if any action is initiated against him on the charges for which a |
| disciplinary proceeding was earlier initiated against him in the year |
| 1997 and he was exonerated of the charges levelled against him. This application stands disposed of as withdrawn with |
| the liberty as aforesaid. |
| (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) |
Vats/-
U
Yogendra Rai Sharma
The State of Bihar
The Director (Primary Education)
The District Education Officer, West Champaran
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court