Civil Writ Jurisdiction application dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the High Court to press the matter despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18882 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Smt. Pyari Devi W/O Late Kedar Prasad Agrawal Resident Of Mohalla - Harijan Tola, P.S. - Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gaya, District - Gaya 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya, District - Gaya 3. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prasoon Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 5 04-07-2016 Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. Counsel for the Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya ( for short ‘the Nagar Panchayat’) as well as the State are present. Counsel for the Nagar Panchayat states that the building plan was not approved by the registered architect. Petitioner has no case to challenge the notice. Be that as it may, as no one has appeared to press this writ application, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Shyam/-
U
Smt. Pyari Devi W/O Late Kedar Prasad Agrawal
The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gaya
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya
The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
