Single judge oral order disposing of a writ application seeking arrears of salary and gratuity. The court allowed the petitioners liberty to raise grievances in fresh proceedings if not redressed.
Writ application disposed of with liberty to petitioners to raise grievances if not redressed in fresh proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17911 of 2011
====================================================== 1. Sri Bhagwan Prasad S/O Alte Ram Khelawan Ram R/O Village - Karman Tola, P.S. And Town - Ara, Distt. Bhojpur 2. Brij Bihari Pandey S/O Ram Sewak Pandey R/O Mohalla - Jagdeo Nagar, P.S. And Towan - Ara, Dist. - Bhojpur 3. Ramesh Prasad Mehta S/O Late Saryu Prasad Mehta R/O Mohalla - Pakdi, Ward No. 16, P.S.And Town - Ara, Distt. - Bhojpur 4. Radhey Shyam Singh S/O Late Brijnath Singh R/O Mohalla - Pachimi Tola, P.S. And Towan - Ara, Distt. - Bhojpur 5. Mahabir Prasad S/O Late Saryug Prasad R/O Mohalla - M.P.Bag, P.S. And Towan - Ara, Distt. - Bhojpur
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Departmetn Of Urban Development, Government Of Biahr, Patna 2. The Ara Municipal Corporation, Ara, Distt. - Bhojpur
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awdhesh Kumar Pandey, GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
7 08-11-2016 The present application has been filed by the petitioners for directing the respondents to pay the arrears of salary accruing on the basis of implementation of 5th and 6th Central Pay Revision and also directed to pay the arrears of gratuity. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as per counter affidavit it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, but, at present, the counsel for the petitioner has no instruction.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17911 of 2011 (7) dt.08-11-2016
2
In the circumstances, the writ
application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise if any grievances, being not redressed in fresh proceeding.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
P.K./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application seeking arrears of salary and gratuity should be disposed of when the petitioner has no further instructions and the grievance is marked redressed.
Bhagwan Prasad and others
State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development, Government Of Bihar
The Ara Municipal Corporation
The Town Commissioner, Ara Municipal Corporation
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
