This court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner had absolutely no legal right to the lands in question, making the petition misconceived.
The writ petition is dismissed as the petitioner has no legal right to the lands in question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16251 of 2014
====================================================== DHRUB NARAYAN KARN Son of Bishambhar Lal Karn Resident of Village - Chakdah, Police Station Raj Nagar, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Madhubani. 4. The Circle Officer, Rahika, Police Station- Rahika, District Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kr. Prasad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr. Parijat Saurav, AC to AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2016 Heard the parties. Apparently, the petitioner has absolutely no legal right with respect to the lands in question. In above view of the matter, the present writ petition is completely misconceived and is hereby dismissed.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
BTiwary/U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has a legal right over the lands in question.
DHRUB NARAYAN KARN
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Madhubani
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Madhubani
The Circle Officer, Rahika
BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
