Disposed

Jayram @ Jayram Viplav v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 Nov 2016CWJC/15596/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a PIL seeking restraint of the State of Bihar from spending public funds on advertisements in newspapers hostile to the Government of India. The court held that the Supreme Court had already decided the issue and directed compliance with existing guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Director shall comply with the order reported in (2015) 7 SCC 1 as modified on 18.03.2016.

Jayram @ Jayram Viplav Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr. — RTI and Transparency | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15596 of 2015 =========================================================== Jayram @ Jayram Viplav, son of Ramashish Choudhary, resident of VillageDhouni, P.O.- Tarapur, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. 2. The Information and Public Relations Department, through its Secretary, Secretariat, Patna (Bihar). .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (PAAG-1) Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, AC to PAAG-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶3

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶4

(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) Date: 17-11-2016

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶6

The petitioner has invoked the Public Interest Litigation jurisdiction of this Court claiming writ of Mandamus to restrain the respondents from wasting public funds in publishing advertisements in News Papers or in any medium which are directly or indirectly hostile, averse, critical and inimical towards Government of India as the same is against cooperative federalism which is basic structure of the Constitution of India.

¶7

The question as to in what manner the State Government can use public funds for publishing advertisements in

¶8

Patna High Court CWJC No.15596 of 2015 dt.17-11-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

News Papers came to be examined by the Supreme Court in a judgment reported in (2015) 7 SCC 1 (Common Cause Versus Union Of India) wherein guidelines framed by a committee was accepted with slight modifications. Such order has been modified on 18.03.2016 in Review Petition (C) Nos.1879-1881/2015 in Writ Petition (C) Nos.13/2003,197/2004 & 302/2012 (State of Karnataka Versus Common Cause And Ors. ETC. ETC.). In view of the fact that the issue of spending public funds in respect of advertisements in News Papers has already been decided by the Supreme Court, no further orders are called for.

¶11

This writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondent shall comply the order reported in (2015) 7 SCC 1 (Common Cause Versus Union Of India) as modified on 18.03.2016.

¶12

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ)

¶13

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶14

K.C.jha/-

¶15

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
UploadingDate	19.11.2016
Transmission Date	N/A

Jayram @ Jayram Viplav v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayram @ Jayram Viplav v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhimanyu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Rang Natha Sharma

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Vs Bal Mukund Mahto and Anr.

M/s Ashok Int Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

The Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi Vs The Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors.

High Court Legal Services Committee, Patna High Court, Patna Through Its Secretary Shri Kishore Pra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.