Allowed

Arbind Paswan v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC21 Jan 2016CWJC/15494/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to withdraw the civil writ application with liberty to file a future application or approach competent statutory authorities. The High Court allowed the withdrawal immediately without objections from respondents.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Court or competent authority in the future.

Arbind Paswan Vs The Union Of India and Ors. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15494 of 2015

¶3

====================================================== Arbind Paswan, S/o Sri Mohan Paswan, Resident of Village Dhuwa Tola Jhajha, P.S. Jhajha, District Jamui.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union of India through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi.

¶7

The Securities & Exchange Board of India through its Local Office at Patna.

¶8

The Central Bureau of Investigation through its Local Office at Patna.

¶9

The State of Bihar.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

¶11

The Superintendent of Police, Jamui.

¶12

Kolkata Weir Industries Ltd., Registered Office Priya Niket, Ground Floor, Diamond Harbour, 24 Parganas(s).

¶13

.... .... Respondents

¶14

====================================================== Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. D.K. Sinha, A.A.G.-2

¶16

Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, AC to AAG-2 For respondent No.3 : Mr. Bipin Bihari Sinha, S C

¶17

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And

¶18

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶19

ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶20

2 21-01-2016 Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, learned Counsel,

¶21

appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. D. K. Sinha, learned Additional Advocate General No.2, appearing for the State respondents. Also heard Mr. Bipin Bihari Sinha, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent No.3.

¶22

After some arguments, Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.15494 of 2015 (2) dt.21-01-2016

¶24

2/2

¶25

competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

¶26

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

¶27

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

¶28

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ)

¶29

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶30

Sunil/-

¶31

Arbind Paswan v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Paswan v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram. Vs Raj Kumar Singh

Arbind Kumar Singh @ Arvind Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Arun Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naresh Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anjani Kumar Sinha Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Champa Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.