Petitioner applied for writ jurisdiction. Counsel submitted the application became infructuous. Single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition as infructuous in an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14635 of 2013
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Singh Son Of Late Rajdeep Singh Resident Of Village - Dharhara, P.O. And P.S. Dharhara, District - Munger
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Chandra Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
2 08-12-2016 Heard Mr. Pravin Chandra, Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that this application has become infructuous.
Patna High Court CWJC No.14635 of 2013 (2) dt.08-12-2016
2
Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(V. Nath, J) Devendra/U
Manoj Kumar Singh
State Election Commissioner, Bihar
District Election Officer cum District Magistrate Munger
Returning Officer Dharahara South Panchayat
Election Observer, Dharhara South Panchayat
Anil Singh
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
