Criminal NCO Dhanvantari Misra. The petitioner's petition regarding the appointment of an Anganwari Sevika was dismissed because the petitioner never appeared in court and the selection process had been re-done due to illegality.
Petition dismissed on account of non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14107 of 2013
===========================================================
Priyanka Kumari Wife of Manoj Kumar Sah, resident of village- Magha Gaddi Tola, Police Station - Magha Garh, District – Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. SANJAY
Mr. Amaresh Kr. Sinha, AC to GA-1
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-12-2016
When the case was called out on 9th November 2016, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. Even today no one is present for the petitioner to press this petition. The counsel for the State is present.
The Court has no other alternative but to dispose of this petition which relates to the appointment of Anganwari Sevika.
From the letter no. 457 dated 4th March 2013 issued by the Office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gopalganj it appears that on enquiry, a report was submitted by the Sub-Divisional Officer where he has informed that the entire proceeding is suffering from illegality and so much so that Aam Sabha could not be completed on account of
Patna High Court CWJC No.14107 of 2013 dt.01-12-2016
2/2
the fact that some disturbance was created by the villager inasmuch as coram was also not completed and was suggested that the step should be taken for fresh selection.
The counsel for the State submits that the aforesaid letter indicates that the entire process of selection was tainted, cannot be legalised.
It appears that the fresh process of selection was started and must have been completed by the I.C.D.S. and the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this petition, in such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N/A |
| UploadingDate | 06/12/2016 |
| Transmission Date |
Priyanka Kumari
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
