In a writ petition, the court disposed of the matter as the respondents indicated a favorable consideration of the petitioner's claim in their counter affidavit. No substantive legal principles were expounded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13747 of 2013
====================================================== Yado Lal Rai S/O Shri Ramadhar Rai Resident Of Village- Tajpur Saraiya, P.S.- Rajepur, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran At Motihari 3. The Superintendent Of Police, East Champaran At Motihari 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Pakrideyal At Pakrideyal, DistrictEast Champaran 5. The Officer-In-Charge, Rajepur P.S. At Rajepur, District- East Champaran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 11-03-2016 Heard. Mr. Shukla in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit seeks disposal of the case. On going through paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 thereof it appears that the respondents are considering his claim favourably. The writ application is disposed of.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
rohit/-
U
Yado Lal Rai
The State Of Bihar
The District Magistrate, East Champaran
The Superintendent Of Police, East Champaran
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Pakrideyal
The Officer-In-Charge, Rajepur P.S.
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
