Dismissed

Ranjeet Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Jan 2016CWJC/13659/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner for admission in a PreDiploma course conducted in session 2012-2014. The court held that since the session was over and studies completed, no useful purpose would be served in re-examining the admission issue.

What did the court decide?

The writ application was dismissed as no useful purpose would be served in re-examining the admission issue after the course session concluded.

Ranjeet Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13659 of 2014

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Ranjeet Chaudhary Son of Sri Dharam Nath Chaudhary Resident of Mohalla Katharibagh, Town Chapra, District- Saran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Education Officer, Chapra at Saran. 3. The Principal Secretary, Education and Training Institution Sonepur, Saran at Chapra.

¶8

.... .... Respondent/s

¶9

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC30- Avinash Kumar

¶10

===========================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-01-2016

¶12

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶13

Petitioner filed the writ application for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to go by the merit-list for admission in PreDiploma in Elementary Education Course, conducted by the District Education and Training Institution, Sonepur at Saran. Matter related to session 2012-2014.

¶14

At the very outset a detailed counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent, especially the Principal of the institution, denying any wrong doing, which has been alleged in the writ application with regard to the admission so granted. The assertion in the counter affidavit prima facie tries to demonstrate that the admission has been given strictly in accordance with reservation

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.13659 of 2014 dt.18-01-2016

¶16

2/2

¶17

quota, available to the beneficiaries. It is also asserted that certain misleading statements have been made by the petitioner deliberately to make out a case.

¶18

Whatever be the position, the fact stands that the admission relates to the session 2012-2014. The session is long over. The students have already completed their course of studies and training. No useful purpose will be served now by racking up the issue, which will remain academic now.

¶19

Writ application stands dismissed even otherwise.

¶20

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶21

SKM/-

¶22

Ranjeet Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ram Prasidh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Ritesh Kumar Tarun Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Narendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Purusotam Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mithila Mithilesh Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Uchcha Vidayalaya Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raushan Kumar Vs The B.r.a. Bihar University and Ors.