This order dismisses the writ petition as infructuous without engaging with the merits of the case or legal principles in light of prior proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13384 of 2013 (3) dt.21-11-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13384 of 2013
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : M/s Subodh Kumar Jha, Pranav Kr. Jha and Sarveshwar Tiwari, Advs. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha, SC-26 Mr. T.M. Ambastha, AC to SC-26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 21-11-2016 The counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has rendered infructuous. In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U
Upendra Nath Verma
The State of Bihar and Others
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
