Nand Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous based on the passage of time without addressing the substantive merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13213 of 2008 (6) dt.20-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13213 of 2008
======================================================
Nand Kumar Singh son of Sri Bikram Singh, resident of village-Surahan, P.O. Soukhara, P.S. Chand, District-Kaimur at Bhabhua
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. (Chittranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Ms. Ratna Kumari, A.C. to PAAG-2 For the Respondents : Dr. Alok Kumar Sinha(CGC)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
(Jyoti Saran, J)
S.Sb/-
U
Nand Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar
The Chief Commissioner, Disabilities Persons, Government of India
The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua
Shambhu Kumar Chaurasiya
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court