The High Court of Patna adjourned to allow the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13150 of 2015 ====================================================== |
||
|---|---|---|
Dr. Pawan Kumar, S/o Late Laxshman Prasad, R/o L/S/ Officer Colony, Sahebpara, Katihar, Bihar at present posted as Sr. DMO/KTR, N.F. Railway, Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2. The General Manager, Northeast Frontier Railway Maligaon, Guwahati. 3.The General Manager (P) Northeast Frontier Railway Maligaon, Guwahati-11 4. The D.G.M., Northeast Frontier Railway Maligaon, Guwahati-11 5. The Secretary, Railway Board, New Delhi. 6. The Chief Medical Superintendent, Northeast Frontier Railway, Katihar 7. The Divisional Railway Manager (P), Katihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mahesh Prasad ====================================================== |
||
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) |
||
| 2 | 12-05-2016 | Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition. |
| It is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. | ||
| (Hemant Gupta, J) | ||
| mrl U |
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) |
Dr. Pawan Kumar
The Union of India
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
