with no effect. In between, the District Magistrate cum Collector on gathering information as to the illegalities in the appointment process ordered for enquiry which included the appointment of the petitioner and a copy of the order of the District Magistrate is present at Annexure-12. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, the enquiry was conducted by the District Land Acquisition Officer and his report is at Annexure-13 upholding his appointment under the unreserved category at roster point no. 2023 yet the petitioner was not reinstated. He next moved before the appellate authority which has been constituted under the amendment introduced to the Bihar Panchayat Teachers Appointment and Service Conditions Rules, 2006 vide his appeal present at Annexure-14 and which was rejected by the appellate authority vide order bearing Memo No. 92 dated 17.2.2010 present at Annexure-15 on grounds that while there were better candidates in the general category, the petitioner could not have been appointed even in the handicapped category in absence of roster clearance. The petitioner questioned the order of the appellate authority before this Court in CWJC No. 7129 of 2010 and this Court taking note of the circumstances reemitted the matter to the appellate authority for re-examination of the matter vide order present at Annexure-17. The remand of the matter giving rise to Case No. 117 of 2010 did not result in any betterment for the petitioner and even in
