The Hon'ble High Court of Patna permitted the withdrawal of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12575 of 2016 after hearing counsel, without recording any specific observation on the legal merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12575 of 2016 (3) dt.13-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12575 of 2016
======================================================
Mani Bhushan Kumar, Son of Sri Lalan Shukla, resident of Prabhat Nagar, Bhagwanpur, P.S- Sadar (Muzaffarpur), District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar, AC to SC-15
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
counsel for the State.
From the Office note and the bench slip filed by the petitioner it appears that it was a simple case of withdrawal, there is nothing in the slip that the writ application will be withdrawn with observation. As it is a case of withdrawal, this case is permitted to be withdrawn. If any objection is filed, the Authority will deal with the same in accordance with law.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U
Mani Bhushan Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Transport
State Transport Authority
State Transport Commissioner
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
