APPLICATION DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Due to the failure of the petitioner's counsel to appear and press the application despite repeated calls, the writ petition was dismissed without any substantive adjudication on the merits or legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12337 of 2013
====================================================== Rajesh Kumar, son of late Rajendra Mahto, resident of village Barsauna, P.O.- Sohepur, P.s.- Wazirganj (O.P.), Tankuupa, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. D.I.G., Secretariat, Old Patna. 4. Superintendent of Police, Gaya. 5. District Magistrate, Gaya. 6. I.G. Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.S. Prasad, G.P.-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 3 15-03-2016 Despite repeated calls, no one has appeared to press the application. The Counsel for the State is, however, present. On earlier occasion also, the Counsel who has appeared on behalf of the petitioner expressed his inability to argue the case. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/-
U
Rajesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
