The High Court at Patna dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite prior notice and repeated calls by the court staff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12039 of 2014
====================================================== Md. Shahid Hussain @ Shahid Hasan, son of Late Sajjad Hussain, resident of village - Dehti, P.S. Palasi, Distt. - Araria
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Purnea 2. The Collector - Cum - District Magistrate, Purnia 3. Deputy Collector, Incharge, Legal Section, Purnia 4. Anchal Adhikari, Srinagar, Anchal District - Purnea 5. Bhola Paswan, son of Mokai Paswan 6. Kailu Paswan, son of Sohan Paswan 7. Mukesh Paswan, son of Shabhlal Paswan Respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 7 resident of village - Santnagar, Chanka, P.S. K. Nagar/Champa Nagar ( O.P. ) Anchal Srinagar, Distt. - Purnea .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent nos.1to4 : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Pd. Sinha, AC to GA-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 02-09-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf is printed in the daily cause list.
The learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4, on the other hand, submits that the present writ petition is completely misconceived and untenable. He further submits that all the relevant materials have not been brought on the record by the petitioner. Therefore, the reliefs sought for on behalf of the petitioner cannot be granted.
Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
U
Md. Shahid Hussain @ Shahid Hasan
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Purnea
The Collector - Cum - District Magistrate, Purnia
Deputy Collector, Incharge, Legal Section, Purnia
Anchal Adhikari, Srinagar
Bhola Paswan
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
