The petitioners filed a writ application but stated during proceedings that there was no subsisting grievance. The court disposed of the application as infructuous on 19-12-2016 based on this admission.
The writ application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11110 of 2015
======================================================
Shambhu Sharan Singh, son of late Mahima Singh, resident of Mohalla9/5, Kasturbapath, North Sri Krishanapuri, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as
infructuous.
(Hemant Gupta, ACJ)
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Mishra
U
Shambhu Sharan Singh
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department and Housing, Government of Bihar
The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division
The District Magistrate, Patna
The Superintendent of Police, Traffic, Patna
Hemant Gupta
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
