The Patna High Court dismissed five connected writ petitions filed by petitioners when they withdrew them with liberty to avail an alternative remedy under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn by petitioners with liberty to avail alternative remedy under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10364 of 2016
======================================================
Kamal Shah, son of Chandradeo Shah, resident of Village- Sirisiya, Police Station- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
With
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10444 of 2016
======================================================
Jitendra Singh, son of Sri Param Singh, resident of Village-Sirisiya, Police Station-Kuchaikot, District-Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
With
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10484 of 2016
====================================================== Akhilesh Singh, son of Sri Subhash Singh, resident of village- Beduan, Police Station- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.10364 of 2016 (5) dt.01-08-2016
2/3
office at Vidyut Bhawan, Patna-800001.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== With Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10559 of 2016
====================================================== Sunil Kumar, son of Late Swaminath Burnwal, resident of Village Yadopur Road, Chunaganj, Ward No.12, Police Station- Gopalganj, DistrictGopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
With
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10781 of 2016
====================================================== Biresh Ray, son of Sri Kamla Ray, resident of village-Hariharpur Polic Station-Yadopur, District-Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : (In CWJC No.10364 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, G.A.-1 Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-1 (In CWJC No.10444 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate
Patna High Court CWJC No.10364 of 2016 (5) dt.01-08-2016
3/3
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, G.A.-1 Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-1 |
|---|
| (In CWJC No.10484 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Rashtogi, A.A.G.-10 Ms. Shelpi Keshaw, A.C. to A.A.G.-10 (In CWJC No.10559 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate |
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha- G.A.-1 Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.G. to G.A.-1 (In CWJC No.10781 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate |
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha- G.A.-1 Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.G. to G.A.-1 ====================================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) |
| 5 01-08-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to |
| withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to avail such as |
| other alternative remedy as the petitioners may wish to avail under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005. |
| The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn |
| with liberty aforesaid. |
(Hemant Gupta, J.)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Sunil/-
U
Kamal Shah
Jitendra Singh
Akhilesh Singh
Sunil Kumar
Biresh Ray
The State of Bihar
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
