Dismissed

Anand Prakash Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Nov 2016CWJC/10315/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed a writ petition concerning the disposal of a representation regarding the petitioner's request. The court held that the petition does not survive as the representation had already been rejected by the principal of the Institute of Industrial Training, Banka, even if not formally communicated.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner advised to take other legal course as available in law.

Anand Prakash Agarwal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10315 of 2013

¶3

====================================================== 1. Anand Prakash Agarwal Son Of Prof. Dr. Dwarka Das Agarwal Resident Of Lalbag Colony, Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur 1, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna 2. The Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat Bailey Road, Patna 3. The Deputy Director , Directorate Of Employment And Training, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna 4. The Principal, Institute Of Industrial Training, Gandhi Chowk, Banka

¶4

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP.7 Mr. S.K. Sarat, AC to GP7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 08-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In the present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for disposal of representation in pursuance of order passed in C.W.J.C. No.1453 of 2012.

¶5

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4 annexing memo no. 62 dated 7.4.2012 by which the Principal of the I.I.T, Gandhi Chowk, Banka has rejected the representation of the petitioner much earlier even before filing of the writ petition. But as per the petitioner the

¶6

Patna High Court CWJC No.10315 of 2013 (4) dt.08-11-2016

¶7

¶8

aforesaid order was never communicated to him.

¶9

However, in view of the prayer made in the writ petition and action taken by the Principal, I.T.I., Banka this writ petition does not survive.

¶10

Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed. However, petitioner, if so advised, may take legal

¶11

course as available in law.

¶12

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶13

Vinay/-

¶14

Anand Prakash Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Prakash Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailesh Kumar Mishra Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Umesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shailendra Kumar Srivastava Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pinku Kumar Chouhan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.