Dismissed

Dinesh Prasad v. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Rural Development New Delhi and Ors.

Patna HC29 Jun 2016CR. WJC/85/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Gramin Dak Sevak, sought a direction for a CBI enquiry into alleged defalcation. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that since the Bihar Police submitted the investigation report to the competent Court, no further order was called for.

What did the court decide?

The direction for an enquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation is refused.

Dinesh Prasad Vs The Union Of India Through The… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.85 of 2016

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dinesh Prasad son of Molvi Mahto, Resident of village- Saibani, P.O.Saibani, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Rural Development, New Delhi 2. The Post Master General Bihar at Patna 3. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶4

The District Magistrate, Patna

¶5

The D.D.C. Patna 6. The Sub Divisional Officer Barh 7. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Nalanda Division at Bihar Sarif 8. The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices Barh, Patna 9. The Sub Post Master Account Office Athamal Gola, Patna

¶6

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents-Union of India : Mr. S. D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, C.G.C. For the respondents –State : Mr. Shyam Kishore Sharma, G.A.-1 Ms Shalini Raut, A.C. to G.A.-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER 4 29-06-2016 The present petition is for a direction for an enquiry by a Central Agency, i.e. Central Bureau of Investigation in Bhakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.343 of 2011 registered in respect of defalcation of huge amount under various schemes of Government of India. The petitioner was a Gramin Dak Sevak . Mr. S. D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the Bihar

¶7

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.85 of 2016 (4) dt.29-06-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

Police has since completed investigation and submitted a report before the competent Court. Since the report has been submitted, the matter lies in the jurisdiction of the Court which is seized of the report.

¶10

In view of the said fact, no orders are called for in the present petition. The same is dismissed.

¶11

(Hemant Gupta, J.)

¶12

Sunil/U T

Dinesh Prasad v. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Rural Development New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Prasad v. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Rural Development New Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrawati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hari Om Sharan Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Razia Begum Vs The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Shatrughan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Kothari Vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, Patna, Bihar

Jitendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.