An oral order in a criminal writ petition where the Court dismissed the application on the ground that it had become infructuous due to the lapse of time.
The application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.391 of 2015
| ====================================================== Nirmala Devi, Wife of Shyamlal. Awadh Vihar Apartment, Flat No. 201, Moolchand Path, Bahadurpur, P.O.- Lohiya Nagar, Police Station - Patrakar Nagar, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Patna. 5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 6. The Superintendent of Police, City West, Patna. 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur. 8. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Phulwari Sharif, Patna. 9. The Officer-in-Charge, Phulwari Sharif Police Station, Patna. 10. The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Danapur. 11. The Circle Officer, Danapur. 12. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan. Son of not known, Angan Construction Pvt. Ltd., Survey Plot No. 1029, Khata No. 185, Thana No. 51, Tauzi No. 5452 situated at Phulwari Sharif Janipur Road, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District - Patna. 13. Udita Kumar. Wife of Sri Manoj Kumar. Resident of Survey Plot No. 1029, Khata No. 185, Thana No. 51, Tauzi No. 5452 situated at Phulwari Sharif Janipur Road, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District - Patna, at present residing in Mohalla - C-4-192, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi - 53. .... .... Respondents |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay(Ga-12) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 28-01-2016 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has |
| submitted that due to lapse of time, the application has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed as infructuous. |
|
| N.H./- | (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) |
| U | T |
Nirmala Devi
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar Ranjan
Udita Kumar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
