In this oral order, the Patna High Court disposed of the criminal writ petition as infructuous upon the submission that averments in the State's counter affidavit rendered the application futile.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.376 of 2015
====================================================== Kailash Ram, Son of Late Hari Ram, resident of village - Ramjanpur, P.S.Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through (D.M. Sheikhpura) 2. Suptd. of Police, Sheikhpura 3. Office Incharge, Barbigha P.S. District-Sheikhpura .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 10-05-2016 At the outset, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the application is disposed of as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant writ petition had become infructuous based on the counter affidavit filed by the State.
Kailash Ram
The State of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
