Dismissed

Sanjay Sah @ Bhondu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Nov 2016CR. REV./515/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a criminal revision application preferring to a judgment by the Additional Sessions Judge that imposed a sence sentence on the petitioner for offences under the IPC and the Arms Act, finding no perversity in the conviction and no impropriety in the sentence.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision application against the sentence imposed by the Appellate Court is dismissed.

Sanjay Sah @ Bhondu Vs The State Of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Revision No.515 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA =========================================================== 1. Sanjay Sah @ Bhondu S/o Late Sreenath Sah R/o- Maharajganj, Kurmitola, P.S.Alamganj, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No. 2, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER

¶3

ORAL

¶4

Date: 24-11-2016

¶5

The petitioner stood convicted of offences punishable under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 28 of the Arms Act, 1959, by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, vide judgment and order, dated 18.06.2015, passed in connection with Alamganj Police Station Case No. 13 of 2015 (G. R. No. 121 of 2015). The learned Trial Court after having held the petitioner guilty of the said offence, sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years, each for the offence punishable under Sections 28 of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The sentences were to run concurrently.

¶6

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.515 of 2016 dt.24-11-2016

¶7

2/3

¶8

2. The petitioner preferred appeal against the said judgment and order of the learned Trial Court, which came to be finally decided, by the judgment and order, dated 03.02.2016, passed, by learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Patna City, in Criminal Appeal No. 151 of 2015. By the said judgment and order, the learned Appellate Court has modified the sentence of imprisonment for the period of 2½ years for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and for the offence punishable under Section 28 of the Arms Act, 1959. While reducing the sentence of imprisonment, the learned Appellate Court has imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for conviction of the petitioner under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 28 of the Arms Act, 1959, each.

¶9

3. The present criminal revision application has been filed against the said judgment and order, dated 03.02.2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Patna City.

¶10

4. On perusal of the impugned judgment and order of the Courts below, I find that so far as the conviction of the petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 28 of the Arms Act, 1959, is concerned, the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from any perversity, warranting this Court’s interference in revisional

¶11

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.515 of 2016 dt.24-11-2016

¶12

3/3

¶13

jurisdiction.

¶14

5. The sentence of imprisonment cannot be said to be inappropriate and disproportionate in the facts and circumstances of the case, in view of the nature of offence proved against him.

¶15

6. This criminal revision application has no merit. It is accordingly dismissed.

¶16

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶17

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶18

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	25.11.2016
Transmission Date	25.11.2016

Sanjay Sah @ Bhondu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sah @ Bhondu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raushan Kumar @ Roushan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Suo Motu Contempt Proceeding Initiated Against Defendent Petitioner In C. Review 10/14 Through High Vs Urmila Devi and Ors.

Gyanti Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ram Bilash Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitu Kumar @ Jitu Vishwakarma Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tahir and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar