Dismissed

Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2016CR. REV./1013/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 1013 of 2015 seeking bail for a juvenile petitioner. Upholding the Sessions Judge's order rejecting bail despite custody exceeding 2.5 years, the Court noted the petitioner was declared a juvenile in five serious IPC and Arms Act cases and chose not to interfere.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision application filed for regular bail is dismissed.

Ashok Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1013 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- AURANGABAD

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Ashok Yadav son of Doman Yadav resident of village- Kanchanbag, P.s.Hussainganj, District- Palamu (under the guardianship of his father namely Doman Yadav) .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar No. 1, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL

¶4

Date: 22-11-2016

¶5

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

¶6

2. The present criminal revision application has been filed under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, against the order, dated 20.07.2015, passed, by learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2015, which arises out of Amba Police Station Case No. 06 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶7

3. The learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, by the impugned order, has upheld the order, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Aurangabad, dated 22.096.2015, whereby the

¶8

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1013 of 2015 dt.22-11-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

petitioner’s application for regular bail has been rejected. The petitioner has been declared a juvenile.

¶11

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody in connection with the said Amba Police Station Case No. 06 of 2014 for more than 2½ years.

¶12

5. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that the petitioner is involved in as many as 5 (five) cases, which are of serious nature involving offences punishable under Section 392/395 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that aspect of the matter, the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, has rejected the petitioner’s application for bail by the impugned order.

¶13

6. Considering the above, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order, dated 20.07.2015, passed, by the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2015.

¶14

7. This revisional application is accordingly

¶15

dismissed.

¶16

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)

¶17

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶18

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	23.11.2016
Transmission Date	23.11.2016

Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachha Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Karan Singh @ Karan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anjani Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Gopal Kumar Choudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jamaluddin @ Aftab Vs The State Of Bihar