Allowed

Jagdish Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Patna HC1 Aug 2016CR. MISC./9755/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted interim bail to accused petitioners who were superannuated officers facing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC. The petitioners were allowed to furnish bail bonds and secure sureties, with the explicit condition that failure to appear on two consecutive trial dates would trigger bail cancellation.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to condition of appearing on consecutive trial dates.

Jagdish Prasad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance — Corruption | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43281 of 2015 (16) dt.01-08-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43281 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 1996 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Awadhesh, Son of Dinferan Dubey, Retired Superintending Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, residing at 303, Rajkishori Apartment, Kavi Raman Path, Police Station- Buddha Colony, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar through the Inspector, Department of Vigilance, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.51876 of 2015

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 1996 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA

¶5

====================================================== Chandrika Yadav, son of Late Mahadeo Yadav, resident of MohallaRampur, P.O. and P.S. Khagaul, District Patna at the relevant time Assistant, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.9755 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 1996 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Jagdish Prasad, son of Late Ramji Lal, presently residing Bakarganj Bajaja, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna at the relevant time Section Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

¶9

Sidheshwar Prasad Singh @ Sidhwar Prasad son of Late Banwari Singh, resident of P/48, Vidyapuri, Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna, retired Assistant, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

¶10

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Bihar Through Vigilance

¶13

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate

¶15

Mr. Nandan Prasad Singh, Advocate

¶16

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Advocate

¶17

Mr. Krishna Rajan Sinha, Advocate

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43281 of 2015 (16) dt.01-08-2016

¶19

Ms. Madhuri Lata, Advocate Mr. Raj Nandan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma Sr. Adv. (Law Off.Vig) Mr. Kedar Singh, AC to Law Officer Ms. Sabita Kumari, AC to Law officer

¶20

===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Vigilance.

¶22

16 01-08-2016

¶23

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Vigilance Case No. 27 of 1996 corresponding to Special Case No. 26 of 1996 for the offences registered under Sections 406, 409, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (c) & (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

¶24

Learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners submits that though the first information report has been lodged in the year 1996, chargesheet in the aforementioned cases has been submitted after prolonged investigation in the year 2015 i.e. 01.10.2015. On the same date, the cognizance of the

¶25

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43281 of 2015 (16) dt.01-08-2016

¶26

offence has been taken and thereafter, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest. It is further submitted that all the petitioners have already superannuated from service. It is further submitted that petitioners shall make themselves available as and when required before the Vigilance Court so that the trial in the aforementioned cases may reach its logical conclusion at the earliest.

¶27

Learned Sr. Counsel for the Vigilance submits that it would be appropriate that the petitioners should cooperate in the trial and only in such an event, the interim protection which has already been extended to them be further confirmed. It is further submitted that petitioners shall make themselves available on all dates before the Court so that no unwarranted hindrance may occur in day to day progress.

¶28

Considering the fair stand taken by the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of

¶29

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43281 of 2015 (16) dt.01-08-2016

¶30

receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance – 1^st , Patna in connection with Vigilance Case No. 27 of 1996 corresponding to Special Case No. 26 of 1996 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶31

It is however, made clear that if the petitioners do not make themselves available at the trial for two consecutive dates, it shall be open for the Vigilance to take appropriate steps in accordance with law for cancellation of their bail. It is also made clear that one of the bailors must be close blood relation of the petitioners.

¶32

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶33

Jagdish/-

¶34

U T

Jagdish Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumar Pansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Abdul Halim @ Halo @ Sk. Halo Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmsheela Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Pratap Singh @ Munna Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ram Lagan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar