The High Court at Patna allowed the petitioners to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application pending before it, relying on a concurrent judgment passed by the same Court.
Leave to withdraw the application is granted; the application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.946 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2025 Year- 2015 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C.Sen Pd.Singh, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U T
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cri. Misc. No. 41316 of 2015Referred¶14
Padam Chand Garg @ Padam Chand Gupta
Balram Garg
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Kumar Singh
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
