Allowed

Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 May 2016CR. MISC./8117/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with a civil dispute involving a property sale. Bail was allowed upon surrender and furnishing of a bond to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon surrender within eight weeks before the Magistrate under Bihta P.S. Case No. 667 of 2015.

Arbind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8117 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -667 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Arbind Kumar son of Late Nand Lal Rai Resident of Village- Chamantola, Bihta, P.S.- Bihta, Dist- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 3 11-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 667 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The prosecution case, in brief, is that in drunken state, husband of the informant executed sale deed for one katha in favour of the petitioner, for which petitioner did not pay any money.

¶5

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent having no criminal history and after receiving the consideration money, husband of the informant had executed the sale deed in favour of the petitioner. He further

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8117 of 2016 (3) dt.11-05-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

submits that all the witnesses, identifier in paragraph 19 and the sale deed witness in paragraph 20 of the case diary have supported that the sale deed was executed in favour of the petitioner after receiving consideration money and the independent witness in paragraph 21 of the case diary has also supported the aforesaid fact. He further submits that the matter relates to civil dispute.

¶9

However, learned A.P.P. for the State submits that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report, hence, opposes the prayer for bail.

¶10

Be that as it may, since the matter relates to civil dispute, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 667 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶11

(Nilu Agrawal, J.)

¶12

Arjun/-

¶13

U T

Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambabu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Prasad @ Sunil Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhu Choudhary @ Prabhu Nath Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Raja Vs The State Of Bihar