In bail application before Patna HC, the petitioner in custody since 10.06.2015 sought release. The court found no grounds to extend bail privilege and dismissed the petition in connection with Section 302 IPC case.
Bail prayer dismissed; petitioner remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6906 of 2016
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2015 Thana -SHARGHAT District- MADHUBANI |
|---|
| ====================================================== |
Haroon Laheri @ Haroon , son of Tahir Laheri, resident of village - Minti, P.S. Saharghat, District Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar No.2 (App) ====================================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
| 3 11-04-2016 Heard Sri Gagandeo Yadav, learned counsel for the |
| petitioner and Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwari, learned AP.P. |
| The petitioner, who is in custody only since 10.6.2015 |
| in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 45 of 2015 |
| registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 34 of |
| the Indian Penal Code corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 321 of |
| 2015 has prayed for grant of bail. |
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the F.I.R. he was not named as accused and falsely he has been implicated whereas learned A.P.P. opposing the prayer for bail submits that in F.I.R. he was disclosed as son of Mr. Tahir Laheri and during investigation witnesses have supported the prosecution case. He has specifically referred to paragraph no. 20 and 21 of the case diary.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6906 of 2016 (3) dt.11-04-2016
2/2
Besides hearing I have also perused the material
available on record.
I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail
to the petitioner.
The petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to grant of bail under Section 437 CrPC.
Haroon Laheri
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
