Allowed

Amrendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Apr 2016CR. MISC./6834/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 385 and 387 IPC involving ransom demands traced to his mobile SIM, directing release on bond with conditions despite opposition from the State.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on execution of bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each; one must be near relative, other must have immovable property in jurisdiction; petitioner to appea

Amrendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6834 of 2016 (3) dt.08-04-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6834 of 2016

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2015 Thana -SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- SHEOHAR

¶5

====================================================== 1. Amrendra Ram, Son of Birja Ram, Resident of Village- Bahuara, P.S. Shyampur Bhatha, District- Sheohar..... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 08-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, from the informant working as Nazir in Dumri Katsari Block ransom of Rs. 2,00,000/- was demanded through mobile and again on refusal ransom of Rs. 50,000/- was demanded and then the informant told the caller to pay only Rs. 25,000/- and then the informant was called at Mushari Market. During investigation on the basis of call details of the said mobile of the caller it revealed that SIM which was used for demanding ransom was used in the mobile of the petitioner.

¶8

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, no amount of ransom was paid and

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6834 of 2016 (3) dt.08-04-2016

¶10

the petitioner is suffering in custody since 11.12.2015 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP opposes.

¶11

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sheohar in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

¶12

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

¶13

avin/-

¶14

U T

Amrendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Rikhiyasan Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Hirday Rai @ Hirday Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Avinash Kumar Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Krishna Kumar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Das Vs The State Of Bihar