Dismissed

Seelak Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2016CR. MISC./58168/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the rejection of his Cr. Revision via Section 482 CrPC, labeling it a barred second revision. The court dismissed the application as devoid of merit and legally barred, finding no illegality in the lower orders regarding the detention order of a truck.

What did the court decide?

Application for quashing of second order is dismissed as barred under Section 397(3) CrPC and devoid of merit.

Seelak Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58168 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2015 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD =========================================================== Seelak Ram son of Sri Ram Kumar, resident of H.No. 10, Village- Petawarh, Block -I, Tahsil Narnaund, District- Hisar (Haryana)

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP

¶10

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶11

Date: 13-05-2016

¶12

By way of the present application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “CrPC”), the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 30^th September, 2015 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Cr. Revision No. 32 of 2015/2 of 2015, whereby the revision application preferred against the order dated 7^th April, 2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad directing to release the truck bearing no. BR-47B5047 to its owner/Director, namely, Mauzam Ali Khan of Baruna Integrated Logistic Pvt. Ltd. on filing Indemnity Bond, has been rejected.

¶13

Though the present application has been filed

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58168 of 2015 dt.13-05-2016

¶15

2/2

¶16

under Section 482 of the CrPC, the same is in the nature of second revision which is barred under Section 397(3) of the CrPC. Even otherwise, I find no illegality either in the order dated 7th April, 2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad or in the order dated 30^th September, 2015 passed by the Revisional Court.

¶17

In that view of the matter, the application, being devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed.

¶18

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

¶19

Kanchan/-

¶20

U T

Seelak Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seelak Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munni Kumari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Parvati Devi @ Archana Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bharat Yadav and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vidya Nand Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mahendra Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.