The High Court at Patna dismissed the petitioner's prayer for bail. The court noted the petitioner's criminal antecedents and declined to extend bail privilege. The order directed the trial court to conclude the trial without unnecessary delay.质地 (quality): thin
Prayer for bail denied; trial directed to conclude within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57013 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2014 Thana -JAMOBAZAR District- SIWAN ====================================================== Nurain Miya son of Late Aziz Miya resident of village - Bhojpurwan, P.S. - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pronati Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 19-01-2016 Heard Sri Ansul, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Pronoti Singh, learned A.P.P.
The petitioner who is in custody in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 85 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since long and accordingly, he makes a prayer for extending the privilege of bail, whereas, the learned A.P.P. opposing the prayer for bail submits that petitioner is accused in number of cases and this fact has been mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the petition.
Keeping in view the criminal antecedent of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57013 of 2015 (3) dt.19-01-2016
2/2
petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner.
In view of the fact that petitioner is in custody, while dismissing the prayer for bail it is desirable to observe that the trial court may take appropriate steps, so that, the trial may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay preferably within a period of six months.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
U |T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is an accused in the Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 85 of 2014.
What steps the trial court should take considering the petitioner's criminal antecedents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nurain Miya
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
