Allowed

Sushil Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2016CR. MISC./52505/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. No. 52505 of 2016, the Hon'ble High Court of Patna granted bail to petitioners Sushil Kumar and Raju Mahto in a case involving offences under Sections 272, 273/34 of IPC and provisions of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions of court presence and no further offences.

Sushil Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52505 of 2016

¶2

Arising out of PS.Case No. -207 Year- 2016 Thana -RAXAUL District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== 1. Sushil Kumar S/o Sarbjeet Ram, Resident of Village – Madhopur, Nankar, P.S. - Sugauli., District East Champaran.

¶4

Raju Mahto S/o Mohan Mahto, resident of Village - Kaurihar Dhanger Toli, P.S. - Raxaul, District - East Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 13-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioners are in custody since 15.09.2016 in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 207 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 47, 51, 54, 57 and 63 of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated for an offence relating to recovery of five litres of country made liquor and the said recovery was made from the courtyard of Sadhu Chaudhary and on whose confessional statement, the petitioners have been implicated along with other co-accused Shiv Patel and Raju Mahto. The petitioners deny having any connection with the premises from where recovery has been made. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

¶14

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52505 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016

¶16

2/2

¶17

10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 207 of 2016 with the following conditions:

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners

¶19

shall be their close relatives.

¶20

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶22

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶23

B.T/Chandran

¶24

U T

Sushil Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Nath @ Bhola Nath Gupta Vs The Bihar Sharif Municipal Corporation, Nalanda At Biharsharif and Ors.

Bipin Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Food and Civil Supplies Govt.of Bi

Umesh Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Niraj Kumar @ Niraj @Chitranjan Kumar Yadav @ Chitranjan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Subhash Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar