Dismissed

Bishun Pandit @ Bishnu Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Dec 2016CR. MISC./51260/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody for alleged offences under Sections 366 and 379 IPC. The order noted the chargesheet was filed and the victim voluntarily accompanied the accused, leading to release on a bond of Rs.10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Bishun Pandit @ Bishnu Pandit Vs The State Of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51260 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVINDPUR District- NAWADA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bishun Pandit @ Bishnu Pandit S/o Ranjit Pandit R/o Village- Choti Pahari, P.S.-Agam Kuan, District-Patna

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-12-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶11

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.04.2016 in connection with Sessions Trial No.495 of 2016/351 of 2016 arising out of Govindpur P.S.Case No.2 of 2016 for offence alleged under Sections 366 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The prosecution case is that the petitioner came to the informant’s house for his daughter’s Rukhsati. The informant’s daughter stated that the petitioner was her Jaut and, as such, was sent to her matrimonial house along with the petitioner, but she did not reach her matrimonial house.

¶13

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51260 of 2016 (2) dt.01-12-2016

¶15

2/2

¶16

petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the aforesaid case. He further submits that the victim Sunita Devi out of her own will went with the petitioner and is major as assessed by the Magistrate and the Medical Board. He further submits that chargesheet has already been submitted, hence, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution witnesses.

¶17

However, learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR, hence, opposes the prayer for bail.

¶18

Be that as it may, since the chargesheet has already been submitted and that the victim girl went with the petitioner out of her own sweet will, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Nawada in connection with Sessions Trial No.495 of 2016/351 of 2016 arising out of Govindpur P.S.Case No.2 of 2016.

¶19

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶20

B.Kr./-

¶21

U T

Bishun Pandit @ Bishnu Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bishun Pandit @ Bishnu Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Kumar @ Schin Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mohammad Yunus Ansari @ Md. Yunus Vs The State Of Bihar

Avani Jha Vs The State Of Bihar

Dablu Kumar Paswan @ Dablu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Barku Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Wali @ Md. Bali Vs The State Of Bihar