Allowed

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2016CR. MISC./50135/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This high court criminal miscellaneous order grants bail to the petitioner, Rahul Kumar, in connection with PS Case No. 144 of 2016 for alleged offences under Section 273 IPC and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. Bail is granted subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50135 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2016 Thana -BAUSI District- PURNIA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Kumar Son of Ranjit Mandal Resident of Village- Gulabbagh, P.S. Sadar, District Purnea.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 16-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶8

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

¶9

The prosecution case is that a jeep being occupied by three persons including this petitioner was apprehended and on search, altogether 156 litres of foreign liquor of Indian origin were seized for which, petitioner happens to be under custody since 08.09.2016. As per para-3 of this petition, petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶10

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50135 of 2016 (3) dt.16-12-2016

¶12

2/2

¶13

petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and that two other co-accused, who were apprehended by the police along with the petitioner, have since been granted the privilege of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 48471 of 2016 on 14.12.2016.

¶14

However, learned A.P.P. for the State submits that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report, hence, opposes the prayer for bail.

¶15

Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2^nd , Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2016.

¶16

(Nilu Agrawal, J.)

¶17

Arjun/-

¶18

U T

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shishu Pal Mistri Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Pintu @ Chintu @ Rajnish @ Chintu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Shailesh Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar