Allowed

Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jan 2016CR. MISC./48864/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted provisional bail for three months to the petitioner in a case of theft and cheating. The petitioner was directed to deposit the misappropriated amount of Rs. 34,000/- within the bail period, after which the bail would be confirmed.

What did the court decide?

Release on provisional bail for three months by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties; to deposit Rs. 34,000/- within the period for confirmation of bail.

Krishna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48864 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2015 Thana -MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMADHUBANI

¶3

====================================================== 1. Krishna Kumar Son of Rudal Pandit, Resident of Village - Shampur, P.S. - Basudebpur, District - Munger.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.P.S.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER

¶5

5 29-01-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P for the State as also the learned counsel for the Informant.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 379 and 420 of the I.P.C

¶7

Allegedly, the A.T.M card of the informant Manju Singh was taken away by unknown after giving another A.T.M. to her and thereafter from her account money was got transferred. During investigation it transpired that by three transactions amount of Rs. 34,000/- was transferred from the account of Manju Singh to the account of the petitioner through A.T.M.

¶8

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is poor young labour, one unknown person has taken away the A.T.M. card of the petitioner by giving another A.T.M.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48864 of 2015 (5) dt.29-01-2016

¶10

2/2

¶11

card to him when he went to withdraw the amount and it appears that unknown fellow got transferred the amount from the account of Manju Singh in the account of the petitioner and some amount has also been withdrawn. However, the petitioner is ready to return back the amount of Rs. 34,000/- to the informant after his release within three months.

¶12

The learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant on that ground do not oppose the prayer for bail.

¶13

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on provisional bail for three months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Madhubani in Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 174 of 2015/ G.R. No. 1015 of 2015 and if the petitioner deposits the amount of Rs. 34,000/- through Bank draft in the name of the informant Manju Singh within said period then the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the learned court below itself and the Bank draft so deposited shall be given to the informant after due verification.

¶14

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous is hereby disposed of.

¶15

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

¶16

Abhay/U T

Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamdeo Yadav @ Shyam Deo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramashish Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Tufani Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahendra Paswan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Arvind Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja Ram Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar