Allowed

Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 May 2016CR. MISC./48740/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of a cognizance order based on a settled dispute regarding a drainage system. The High Court allowed the application and set aside the cognizance order and related proceedings in PS Case No.118 of 2013 and PS Case No.117 of 2013 pending in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

What did the court decide?

The proceedings of Simari P.S. Case No. 118 of 2013 and Simari P.S. Case No. 117 of 2013, including the order of cognizance dated 7.10.2013 in Case No. 118, are set aside.

Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48740 of 2013

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2013 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai

¶6

Vikash Kuamr Rai @ Vikash Rai

¶7

Vinita Kumari @ Vikki all are son and daughter of Hare Ram Rai, Resident Of Village- Rajapur, Beni Lal Ke Dera, P.S.- Simari, Dist.- Buxar

¶8

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State Of Bihar

¶11

Gorakh Nath Tiwary S/O Late Lakshman Tiwary, Resident Of Village- Rajapur, Beni Lal Ke Dera, P.S.- Simari, Dist.- Buxar

¶12

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶13

===========================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh 1, APP

¶16

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date: 17-05-2016

¶18

No one appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2.

¶19

The Petitioners seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 7.10.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Simari P.S. case No.118 of 2013.

¶20

The case of the Informant is that on a petty dispute of drainage system both the parties clashed with each other and instituted one case each against each other. In the case instituted by the Petitioners charge sheet was submitted but the Court held that no offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out. As against the same the Petitioners have moved quashing application.

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48740 of 2013 dt.17-05-2016

¶22

2/2

¶23

The Petitioners submit that they are ready to withdraw the said case bearing Simari P.S. case No.117 of 2013 since now the dispute, which was topical in nature, has been settled and it would be in their interest that both the prosecutions be set aside.

¶24

Considering such submission, the application is allowed and the proceeding of Simari P.S. case No.118 of 2013 including the order of cognizance dated 7.10.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Simari P.S. case No.118 of 2013 as also the proceeding of Simari P.S. case No.117 of 2013 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar is hereby set aside.

¶25

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶26

Narendra/-

¶27

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE
Uploading Date	26.05.2016
Transmission Date	26.05.2016

Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadanand Mandal and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Zeenat Parween and Anrs. Vs the State of Bihar

Lalit Chandak and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Nazma Khatoon and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dr. Ashraf Ali Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.