The single judge declined to grant anticipatory bail in a repeat application arising from a criminal case involving offences under sections 363, 366(A), and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, citing previous rejections of similar prayers by the same court.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48093 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2007 Thana -DESARI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sucheta Yadav
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER
This is repeat application seeking anticipatory bail in
Desri P.S. Case No. 106 of 2007 registered under sections 363, 366(A) and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, twice, his prayer for bail has been rejected by this Court.
I do not find a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.
Prayer is rejected.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a repeat application arising out of cases involving offences under sections 363, 366(A) and 120B of the IPC given previous rejections?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NISHA DEVI @ NISHA KUMARI W/O SURENDRA RAJAK @ SUKENDRA RAJAK
THE STATE OF BIHAR
KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
