Dismissed

Shivanandan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jun 2016CR. MISC./47205/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an order affirming the removal and repositioning of a vehicle. The Court found no illegality in the impugned order and declined to exercise jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed; the impugned order affirming the vehicle removal was upheld.

Shivanandan Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47205 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Shivanandan Prasad Singh, Son Of Ashutosh Prasad Singh, Resident Of R.K. Bhattacharya Road, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Arun Kumar, Son of Sri Ramdeo Prasad, Lalgi Tola, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan Patna-800001. .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Janam Maharaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Ehtesamuddin(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶3

5 23-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2 and also learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State (O.P.No.1).

¶4

This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 05.08.2013 passed in Criminal Revision No. 33 of 2011, whereunder the learned Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Patna dismissed the aforesaid Criminal Revision of the petitioner affirming the order dated 14.12.2010 passed in Case No. 1051(M) of 2010 by the S.D.M, Sadar, Patna in proceeding under Section 147 Cr.P.C. to remove the vehicle by the member of second party-petitioner to the front of chamber of the member of first party-O.P. No.2 and park the vehicle any other place.

¶5

The leanred counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 14.12.2010 passed in Case No. 1051(M) of 2010 to

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47205 of 2013 (5) dt.23-06-2016

¶7

2/2

¶8

remove the vehicle to front of chamber of member of first partyO.P.No.02 by the member of 2^nd party petitioner was passed ex party but the learned Adhoc Sessions Judge-1^st , Patna illegality affirmed the same through the impugned order.

¶9

On going through the impugned order, it appears that the learned Adhoc Sessions Judge on consideration of the submission and material placed by the petitioner has affirmed the order dated 14.12.2010 passed by the S.D.M., Sadar, Patna to remove vehicle from the front of chamber of member of first party-O.P.No.02 and to place anywhere within one week under Section 147 Cr.P.C. I find no illegality to interfere with impugned order in extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and accordingly this application is dismissed.

¶10

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶11

manish/U T

Shivanandan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivanandan Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Choudhary @ Dilip Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mokhtar Mian Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhuto Yadav @ Bhuneshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Anuj Kumar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dr. Anil Sulabh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mokhtar Alam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.