The petition was dismissed on account of non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the date of hearing to argue or request adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46397 of 2015
| ====================================================== 1. Sukhari Singh, Son of Late Daroga Singh 2. Sunil Singh, son of Ram Bilas Singh Both residents of village- Jasaulli Patti, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sucheta Yadav (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 3 |
29-01-2016 Today again on call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either to press this petition or to make a prayer for |
| adjournment. Yesterday also, there was non-appearance. Smt. | |
| Sucheta Yadav, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor is present. She submits that it is not a case for modification of earlier order dated 20.08.2015 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21353 of 2015. Be that as it may, since none appeared on behalf of the petitioners, the petition stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. |
|
| (Rakesh Kumar, J) | |
| NKS/- U |
Sukhari Singh
Sunil Singh
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
