Shaligram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Patna rejected an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that considering the nature of the offenses regarding fraudulent ATM card misuse, anticipatory bail was not granted, and the petitioner was directed to surrender regularly.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41020 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -527 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI District- BHAGALPUR
===================================== 1. Shaligram Yadav, son of Bhola Yadav, resident of VillagePipaltola, Kamra, P.S.- Balrampur (Telta O.P.) DistrictKatihar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s
- The State of Bihar.
=====================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP
=====================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in cases involving fraud and misuse of ATM cards under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shaligram Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court