Dismissed

Prakash Kumar Rakesh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 May 2016CR. MISC./3883/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous application, the petitioner sought quashing of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order taking cognizance under Section 354 IPC. The court examined the FIR and found allegations attracted the said offence. Dismissing the application, the court held there was no illegality in the impugned order though liberty was granted to agitate points later.

What did the court decide?

The application for quashing the impugned order is dismissed.

Prakash Kumar Rakesh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3883 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -359 Year- 2011 Thana -KANKARBAGH District- PATNA

¶4

=========================================================== Prakash Kumar Rakesh son of Upendra Kumar, resident of Bangali Tola, P.S.Jakkanpur, District- Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Archana Singh daughter of Birendra Kumar Singh, resident of Khas Mahal More, Kalyan Bhawan, 2nd Floor, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP

¶12

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date: 06-05-2016

¶14

Heard Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

¶15

petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶16

2. By way of the present application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 12.12.2011 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Kankerbagh P.S. Case No.359 of 2011 by which he has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the Code”).

¶17

3. I perused the allegations made in the FIR as contained in annexure-1 to the present application. The allegations made therein do attract ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 354 of

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3883 of 2015 dt.06-05-2016

¶19

2/2

¶20

the Code. In course of investigation, the police have found the allegations „to be true‟ and submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner pursuant to which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence.

¶21

4. I see no illegality in the order impugned dated

¶22

12.12.2011. Accordingly, the application is dismissed .

¶23

5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to agitate all the points available to him before the trial court at the stage of framing of charge.

¶24

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

Md.S./-

¶26

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE
Uploading Date	7.5.2016
Transmission Date	7.5.2016

Prakash Kumar Rakesh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Kumar Rakesh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. K.c. Vidyarthi Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Patna Bihar and Ors.

Raja Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Farmood Vs The State Of Bihar

Budhdeo Paswan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Prianka Priyadarshni Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.