Suresh Kumar Sharma v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36101 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -213 Year- 2011 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Suresh Kumar Sharma S/O Late Babulal Sharma R/V Bhagwan Bazar, Near Sisa Godam, Krishna Colony, P.S- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Chhapra. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shiwangi Kumari @ Shiwangi Sharma W/O Sri Suresh Kumar Sharma , D/O Sri Shambhu Lal Vishwakarma R/V Chitrakut Nagar, Road No. 12, Takiyapar, Danapur, P.S- Danapur, Distt- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vindhkeshri Kumar, Sr.Adv. Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 7 20-06-2016 At the very outset, Sri Vindhkeshri Kumar, learned senior counsel, who was assisted by Sri Nawal Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that though the present petition was filed for quashing of an order dated 16.11.2012 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur who declined to discharge the petitioner, by the same order the learned Magistrate has declined to transfer the case from the court of S.D.J.M., Danapur to proper jurisdiction.
Sri Vindhkeshri Kumar, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri Nawal Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned Additional Public Prosecutor as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36101 of 2013 (7) dt.20-06-2016
2/2
well as Sri Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the informant / opposite party no. 2 makes a prayer for allowing the petitioner to withdraw the petition so that, petitioner may file appropriate petition before appropriate authority. He submits that order of rejection of discharge petition may not be interfered with, but he takes a plea that on the ground of territorial jurisdiction petitioner may take appropriate step. Accordingly, he makes a prayer for withdrawal of the present petition.
The prayer is allowed.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
U T
Suresh Kumar Sharma
State Of Bihar
Shiwangi Kumari @ Shiwangi Sharma
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court