Sikandar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

	IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3565 of 2016
	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -199 Year- 2014 Thana -GAURICHAK District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Sikandar Kumar Son of Late Shivendra Prasad, Resident of Village - Parwalpur, P.S. Parwalpur, District - Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER
3	12-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
	the learned A.P.P for the State.
	The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence
	punishable under section 395 of the I.P.C

The petitioner is not named in the FIR, his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused and thereafter the petitioner was apprehended and he was put on the test identification parade and in the test identification parade the informant identified the petitioner stating that he administered injection causing him senseless and fled away with loaded truck. Submission is of false implication and that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, he is in custody since 14.08.2014, only the informant has identified the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3565 of 2016 (3) dt.12-02-2016

2/2

petitioner and other co-accused, namely, Pinku Kumar, Mantu Kumar and Rajesh Kumar have already been allowed bail by the learned court below itself and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that from the impugned order it reveals that the petitioner was identified by the informant.